基于层次分析法对北上广新能源汽车推广政策的比较

doi:10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.1805

上海大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 973-.doi: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.1805

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

基于层次分析法对北上广新能源汽车推广政策的比较

吴雪斌¹, 王恩慈¹, 范松¹, 浦娴娟², 焦正²

1.上海大学经济学院, 上海 200444;
2. 上海大学环境与化学工程学院, 上海 200444

收稿日期:2016-04-07 出版日期:2017-12-30 发布日期:2017-12-30
通讯作者: 焦正(1972—), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 博士, 研究方向为环境与化学. E-mail: zjiao@shu.edu.cn

Comparative study on policies for promoting new energy automobiles in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou based on analysis hierarchy process

WU Xuebin¹, WANG Enci¹, FAN Song¹, PU Xianjuan², JIAO Zheng²

1. School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
2. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineer, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received:2016-04-07 Online:2017-12-30 Published:2017-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用层次分析法(analysis hierarchy process, AHP) 从补贴政策、充电基础设施建设政策、交通管制政策、政府采购政策共4 个维度对北上广新能源汽车推广政策进行比较研究.通过量化研究得出: 充电基础设施建设政策的权重系数最大, 补贴政策的权重最小; 我国新能源汽车推广政策存在补贴力度过大, 而补贴政策设置不合理, 且政府采购政策不够细化, 缺乏强制性等问题. 针对上述问题, 提出了相关建议.

关键词: 层次分析法, 新能源汽车, 十城千辆工程

Abstract:

This is a comparative study of the policies for promoting new energy automobiles in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in four dimensions: subsidies, installation of charging infrastructure, traffic control, and government procurement. In a quantified research, we find that the weight of policies for installation of charging infrastructure is maximum and that of subsidy policies is minimum. Problems exist in the policies for promoting new energy in China, including too many subsidies, unreasonable design of subsidy policies, rough policies of government procurement, and lack of coerciveness. Suggestions are made for solving these problems.

Key words: analytic hierarchy process, policy for promoting new energy automobiles, ten cities one thousand new energy vehicles project

吴雪斌, 王恩慈, 范松, 浦娴娟, 焦正. 基于层次分析法对北上广新能源汽车推广政策的比较[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 23(6): 973-.

WU Xuebin, WANG Enci, FAN Song, PU Xianjuan, JIAO Zheng. Comparative study on policies for promoting new energy automobiles in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou based on analysis hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Shanghai University（Natural Science Edition）, 2017, 23(6): 973-.

[1]	马振, 万皓. 燃煤烟气氨法脱硫过程的综合风险评价[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 24(1): 92-99.
[2]	王恩慈1, 范松1, 吴雪斌1, 浦娴娟2, 焦正1,2, 聂永有1. 基于GREET模型的新能源汽车污染排放特征分析[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 23(5): 810-820.
[3]	李慧, 单而芳, 孙广帅. 货物库存风险评价的两阶段fuzzy-AHP模型[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 21(6): 784-794.
[4]	金彦亮, 白植树, 周旭琴, 马威. 基于自适应的多属性垂直切换算法[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 21(4): 414-421.
[5]	陈以增, 于齐. 基于SERVQUAL 模型的商圈服务质量模糊综合评价[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 20(3): 296-303.

基于层次分析法对北上广新能源汽车推广政策的比较

Comparative study on policies for promoting new energy automobiles in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou based on analysis hierarchy process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价