研究论文

基于层次分析法对北上广新能源汽车推广政策的比较

展开
  • 1.上海大学经济学院, 上海 200444;
    2. 上海大学环境与化学工程学院, 上海 200444

收稿日期: 2016-04-07

  网络出版日期: 2017-12-30

Comparative study on policies for promoting new energy automobiles in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou based on analysis hierarchy process

Expand
  • 1. School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
    2. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineer, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2016-04-07

  Online published: 2017-12-30

摘要

采用层次分析法(analysis hierarchy process, AHP) 从补贴政策、充电基础设施建设政策、交通管制政策、政府采购政策共4 个维度对北上广新能源汽车推广政策进行比较研究.通过量化研究得出: 充电基础设施建设政策的权重系数最大, 补贴政策的权重最小; 我国新能源汽车推广政策存在补贴力度过大, 而补贴政策设置不合理, 且政府采购政策不够细化, 缺乏强制性等问题. 针对上述问题, 提出了相关建议.

本文引用格式

吴雪斌, 王恩慈, 范松, 浦娴娟, 焦正 . 基于层次分析法对北上广新能源汽车推广政策的比较[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2017 , 23(6) : 973 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.1805

Abstract

This is a comparative study of the policies for promoting new energy automobiles in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in four dimensions: subsidies, installation of charging infrastructure, traffic control, and government procurement. In a quantified research, we find that the weight of policies for installation of charging infrastructure is maximum and that of subsidy policies is minimum. Problems exist in the policies for promoting new energy in China, including too many subsidies, unreasonable design of subsidy policies, rough policies of government procurement, and lack of coerciveness. Suggestions are made for solving these problems.

文章导航

/