量子材料聚焦:KTaO3二维界面超导

尹鑫茂; 孙孟霞; 宁苑杰; 代靓; 李敏娟; 蔡传兵

doi:10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2582

上海大学学报(自然科学版) >

2025 , Vol. 31 >Issue 4: 591 - 606

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2582

材料科学

量子材料聚焦:KTaO₃二维界面超导

尹鑫茂 ,
孙孟霞 ,
宁苑杰 ,
代靓 ,
李敏娟 ,
蔡传兵

展开

上海大学理学院上海市高温超导重点实验室, 上海 200444

收稿日期: 2024-03-11

网络出版日期: 2025-09-16

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52172271, 12374378, 52307026); 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFE03150200); 上海市科技创新行动计划资助项目(22511100200, 23511101600); 中科院先导专项(XDB25000000)

收起

Focus on quantum materials: KTaO₃ two-dimensional interface superconductivity

YIN Xinmao ,
SUN Mengxia ,
NING Yuanjie ,
DAI Liang ,
LI Minjuan ,
CAI Chuanbing

Expand

Shanghai Key Laboratory of High Temperature Superconductors, College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2024-03-11

Online published: 2025-09-16

Fold

摘要

钙钛矿氧化物异质界面中二维电子气(two-dimensionalelectron gas,2DEG)与界面超导性的发现使其成为研究热点之一.近年来,氧化物界面研究取得突破性进展,除了传统的LaAlO$_{3}$/SrTiO$_{3}$(LAO/STO)界面,2021年在KTaO$_{3}$(KTO)界面也发现超导性,其超导转变温度($T_{\rm c}$)较LAO/STO高出一个数量级,约为2 K,引起广泛关注.与STO界面体系相比,KTO氧化物界面显现出高载流子迁移率、强自旋轨道耦合(spin-orbit coupling,SOC)等特点,为理解非常规超导机制和构建新物理特性的研究提供了新途径,使KTO异质界面成为未来电子和自旋电子应用的有力候选者.本文旨在总结近5年KTO界面的最新进展,概述多种氧化物与KTO界面超导的新奇物理现象,并讨论目前研究中尚未解决的问题,为未来研究提供参考.

关键词： 氧化物异质界面; 非常规超导; 二维电子气; 自旋轨道耦合; 量子材料; 器件应用

本文引用格式

尹鑫茂 , 孙孟霞 , 宁苑杰 , 代靓 , 李敏娟 , 蔡传兵 . 量子材料聚焦:KTaO₃二维界面超导[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2025 , 31(4) : 591 -606 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2582

Abstract

The discovery of two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) and interfacial superconductivity within perovskite oxide heterostructures has made them one of the research hotspots. In recent years, there have been groundbreaking advancements in the study of oxide interfaces. In addition to the conventional LaAlO$_{3}$/SrTiO$_{3}$ (LAO/STO) interface, superconductivity has been observed at the KTaO$_{3}$ (KTO) interface in 2021, with a superconducting transition temperature ($T_{\rm c}$) approximately an order of magnitude higher than that of LAO/STO, reaching around 2 K, sparking widespread attention. Compared to the STO interface system, the KTO oxide interface exhibits characteristics such as high carrier mobility and strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC), providing a new avenue for understanding the mechanism of unconventional superconductivity and studying new physical properties, thus establishing KTO heterostructures as promising candidates for future electronic and spintronic applications. This paper aims to summarize the latest progress in KTO interfaces over the past five years, provide an in-depth overview of the novel physical phenomena of superconductivity at the interfaces of various oxides and KTO, and discuss unresolved issues in current researches, thereby guiding the direction of future investigations.

Key words： oxide heterointerfaces; unconventional superconductivity; two-dimensional electron gas; spin-orbit coupling; quantum material; application device

参考文献

[1] Reyren N, Thiel S, Caviglia A D, et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides [J]. Science, 2007, 317(5842): 1196-1199.
[2] Gozar A, Logvenov G, Kourkoutis L F, et al. High-temperature interface superconductivity between metallic and insulating copper oxides [J]. Nature, 2008, 455(7214): 782-785.
[3] Li D, Lee K, Wang B Y, et al. Superconductivity in an inflnite-layer nickelate [J]. Nature, 2019, 572(7771): 624-627.
[4] Ugeda M M, Bradley A J, Zhang Y, et al. Characterization of collective ground states in single-layer NbSe₂ [J]. Nature Physics, 2015, 12(1): 92-97.
[5] Cao Y, Fatemi V, Fang S, et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices [J]. Nature, 2018, 556(7699): 43-50.
[6] Chen G, Sharpe A L, Gallagher P, et al. Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moire superlattice [J]. Nature, 2019, 572(7768): 215-219.
[7] Liu Y, Ma C, Zhang Q, et al. 2D electron gas and oxygen vacancy induced high oxygen evolution performances for advanced Co₃O₄/CeO₂ nanohybrids [J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(21): 1900062.
[8] Chen Y Z, Bovet N, Trier F, et al. A high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas at the spinel/perovskite interface of γ-Al₂O₃/SrTiO₃ [J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4(1): 1371.
[9] He T, Liu W, Lv T, et al. MXene/SnO2 heterojunction based chemical gas sensors [J]. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2021, 329: 129275.
[10] Bert J A, Kalisky B, Bell C, et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ interface [J]. Nature Physics, 2011, 7(10): 767-771.
[11] Caviglia A D, Gariglio S, Reyren N, et al. Electric fleld control of the LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ interface ground state [J]. Nature, 2008, 456(7222): 624-627.
[12] Tang C S, Zeng S, Diao C, et al. Two-dimensional charge localization at the perovskite oxide interface [J]. Applied Physics Reviews, 2022, 9(3): 031405.
[13] Edge J M, Kedem Y, Aschauer U, et al. Quantum critical origin of the superconducting dome in SrTiO₃ [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2015, 115(24): 247002.
[14] Richter C, Boschker H, Dietsche W, et al. Interface superconductor with gap behaviour like a high-temperature superconductor [J]. Nature, 2013, 502(7472): 528-531.
[15] Liu C, Yan X, Jin D, et al. Two-dimensional superconductivity and anisotropic transport at KTaO₃(111) interfaces [J]. Science, 2021, 371(6530): 716-721.
[16] Thompson J R, Boatner L A, Thomson J O. Very low-temperature search for superconductivity in semiconducting KTaO₃ [J]. Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 1982, 47(5): 467-475.
[17] Chen Z, Liu Y, Zhang H, et al. Electric fleld control of superconductivity at the LaAlO₃/KTaO₃(111) interface [J]. Science, 2021, 372(6543): 721-724.
[18] Cooper V R. Enhanced carrier mobilities in two-dimensional electron gases at III-III/I-V oxide heterostructure interfaces [J]. Physical Review B, 2012, 85(23): 235109.
[19] Himmetoglu B, Janotti A. Transport properties of KTaO₃ from flrst-principles [J]. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2016, 28(6): 065502.
[20] Zhang H, Yun Y, Zhang X, et al. High-mobility spin-polarized two-dimensional electron gases at EuO/KTaO₃ interfaces [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2018, 121(11): 116803.
[21] Goyal S, Wadehra N, Chakraverty S. Tuning the electrical state of 2DEG at LaVO₃iKTaO₃ interface: efiect of light and electrostatic gate [J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2020, 7(16): 2000646.
[22] Jellison G E, Paulauskas I, Boatner L A, et al. Optical functions of KTaO₃ as determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry and comparison with band structure calculations [J]. Physical Review B, 2006, 74(15): 155130.
[23] Fujiwara T, Sasahara A, Happo N, et al. Single-crystal model of highly e-cient watersplitting photocatalysts: a KTaO₃ wafer doped with calcium cations [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2020, 32(4): 1439-1447.
[24] Wadehra N, Tomar R, Halder S, et al. Electronic structure modiflcation of the KTaO₃ single-crystal surface by Ar+ bombardment [J]. Physical Review B, 2017, 96(11): 115423.
[25] King P D, He R H, Eknapakul T, et al. Subband structure of a two-dimensional electron gas formed at the polar surface of the strong spin-orbit perovskite KTaO₃ [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2012, 108(11): 117602.
[26] Tyunina M, Narkilahti J, Plekh M, et al. Evidence for strain-induced ferroelectric order in epitaxial thin-fllm KTaO₃ [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2010, 104(22): 227601.
[27] Bae I T, Ichinose T, Han M G, et al. Tensile stress efiect on epitaxial BiFeO₃ thin fllm grown on KTaO₃ [J]. Scientiflc Reports, 2018, 8(1): 893.
[28] Golovina I S, Kolesnik S P, Bryksa V P, et al. Defect driven ferroelectricity and magnetism in nanocrystalline KTaO₃ [J]. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2012, 407(4): 614-623.
[29] Sakai A, Kanno T, Yotsuhashi S, et al. Thermoelectric properties of electron-doped KTaO₃ [J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2009, 48(9): 097002.
[30] Yamaichi E, Watanabe K, Imamiya K, et al. Photoluminescence in KTaO₃ single crystal [J]. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 1987, 56(5): 1890-1897.
[31] Zhou Z, Huang G, Shen J, et al. WSe₂/2D electron gas heterojunction on KTaO₃ for roomtemperature giant photoconductivity [J]. Ceramics International, 2021, 47(6): 7425-7429.
[32] Dumen M, Singh A, Goyal S, et al. Photoconductivity of the EuO KTO interface: efiect of intrinsic carrier density and temperature [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2021, 125(28): 15510-15515.
[33] Chen Z, Liu Z, Sun Y, et al. Two-dimensional superconductivity at the LaAlO₃/KTaO₃(110) heterointerface [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2021, 126(2): 026802.
[34] Nakamura H, Kimura T. Electric fleld tuning of spin-orbit coupling in KTaO₃ fleld-efiect transistors [J]. Physical Review B, 2009, 80(12): 121308.
[35] Gariglio S, Caviglia A D, Triscone J M, et al. A spin-orbit playground: surfaces and interfaces of transition metal oxides [J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2019, 82(1): 012501.
[36] Hua X, Meng F, Huang Z, et al. Tunable two-dimensional superconductivity and spin-orbit coupling at the EuO/KTaO₃(110) interface [J]. NPJ Quantum Materials, 2022, 7(1): 97.
[37] Hua X, Zeng Z, Meng F, et al. Superconducting stripes induced by ferromagnetic proximity in an oxide heterostructure [J]. Nature Physics, 2024, 20(6): 957-963.
[38] Qiao W, Ma Y, Yan J, et al. Gate tunability of the superconducting state at the EuO/KTaO₃(111) interface [J]. Physical Review B, 2021, 104(18): 184505.
[39] Liu C, Zhou X, Hong D, et al. Tunable superconductivity and its origin at KTaO₃ interfaces [J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 951.
[40] Sun Y, Liu Y, Hong S, et al. Critical thickness in superconducting LaAlO₃/KTaO₃(111) heterostructures [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2021, 127(8): 086804.
[41] Chen X, Yu T, Liu Y, et al. Orientation-dependent electron-phonon coupling in interfacial superconductors LaAlO₃/KTaO₃ [DB/OL]. (2023-01-31) [2024-02-20]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13488.
[42] Mallik S, Menard G C, Saiz G, et al. Superfluid stifiness of a KTaO₃-based two-dimensional electron gas [J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 4625.
[43] Al-Tawhid A H, Kanter J, Hatefipour M, et al. Superconductivity and weak antilocalization at KTaO₃(111) interfaces [J]. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2022, 51(11): 6305- 6309.
[44] Liu Y, Liu Z, Zhang M, et al. Superconductivity in epitaxially grown LaVO₃/KTaO₃(111) heterostructures [J]. Chinese Physics B, 2023, 32(3): 037305
[45] Maryenko D, Maznichenko I V, Ostanin S, et al. Superconductivity at epitaxial LaTiO₃- KTaO₃ interfaces [J]. APL Materials, 2023, 11(6): 061102.
[46] Kim J, Yu M, Lee J-W, et al. Electronic-grade epitaxial (111) KTaO₃ heterostructures [J]. Science Advances, 2024, 10(21): eadk4288.
[47] Arnault EG, Al-Tawhid A H, Salmani-Rezaie S, et al. Anisotropic superconductivity at KTaO₃(111) interfaces [J]. Science Advances, 2023, 9(7): eadf1414.
[48] Gan Y, Yang F, Kong L, et al. Light-induced giant rashba spin-orbit coupling at superconducting KTaO₃(110) heterointerfaces [J]. Advanced Materials, 2023, 35(25): 2370180.
[49] Al-Tawhid A H, Poage S J, Salmani-Rezaie S, et al. Enhanced critical fleld of superconductivity at an oxide interface [J]. Nano Letters, 2023, 23(15): 6944-6950.
[50] Zhang G, Wang L, Wang J, et al. Spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking in KTaO₃ heterointerface superconductors [J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 3046.
[51] Ueno K, Inoue I H, Yamada T, et al. Field-efiect transistor based on KTaO₃ perovskite [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2004, 84(19): 3726-3728.
[52] Sekiya D, Nakamura H, Kimura T. Enhanced carrier injection in perovskite fleld-efiect transistors via low-barrier contacts [J]. Applied Physics Express, 2011, 4(6): 064103.
[53] Zhang C, Zhang X, Xu R, et al. Ion-liquid-gated KTaO₃-based electric double layer transistor [J]. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 2023, 44(12): 1987-1990.
[54] Tian X, Li B, Sun H, et al. Visible-light-driven semiconductor-metal transition in electron gas at the (100) surface of KTaO₃ [J]. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13(23): 3055.
[55] Goyal S, Tomar R, Chakraverty S. Photodynamics study of KTaO₃-based conducting interfaces [J]. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2021, 3(2): 905-911.
[56] Zhai J, Trama M, Liu H, et al. Large nonlinear transverse conductivity and berry curvature in KTaO₃ based two-dimensional electron gas [J]. Nano Letters, 2023, 23(24): 11892-11898.
[57] Kumar N, Kakkar S, Bera C. High thermoelectric power factor in LaVO₃/KTaO₃ heterostructure [J]. Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2023, 146: 115525.
[58] Ojha S K, Gogoi S K, Patidar M M, et al. Oxygen vacancy-induced topological Hall efiect in a nonmagnetic band insulator [J]. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 2020, 3(7): 2000021.
[59] Wadehra N, Chakraverty S. Electrostatic memory in KTaO₃ [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2019, 114(16): 163103.
[60] Zhang H, Zhu Z, Zhu Y C, et al. Fermi-level-dependent charge-to-spin conversion of the twodimensional electron gas at the γ-Al₂O₃/KTaO₃ interface [J]. Physical Review Applied, 2023, 19(3): 034045.
[61] Zheng S, Ma J, Fang K, et al. High-voltage potassium ion micro-supercapacitors with extraordinary volumetric energy density for wearable pressure sensor system [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(17): 2003835.
[62] Garcia-Barcelo J M, Melcon A A, Cuendis S A, et al. On the development of new tuning and inter-coupling techniques using ferroelectric materials in the detection of dark matter axions [J]. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 30360-30372.
[63] Kumar N, Wadehra N, Tomar R, et al. Observation of Shubnikov de Haas oscillations, planar Hall efiect, and anisotropic magnetoresistance at the conducting interface of EuO KTaO₃ [J]. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 2020, 4(1): 2000081.
[64] Zhang H, Ma Y, Zhang H, et al. Thermal spin injection and inverse edelstein efiect of the twodimensional electron gas at EuO-KTaO₃ interfaces [J]. Nano Letters, 2019, 19(3): 1605-1612.
[65] Ren T, Li M, Sun X, et al. Two-dimensional superconductivity at the surfaces of KTaO₃ gated with ionic liquid [J]. Science Advances, 2022, 8(22): eabn4273.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献