应急供应链管理

考虑事故发生率的燃气安全监管演化博弈模型与仿真分析

展开
  • 1.山东工商学院 公共管理学院, 山东 烟台 264005
    2.烟台市特种设备检验研究院, 山东 烟台 265500
王循庆(1985-), 男, 副教授, 博士,研究方向为公共安全与危机管理、公共政策与系统优化. E-mail: xunqingwang@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-06-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-01-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71603109);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2021MG025)

Evolutionary game model and simulation analysis of gas safety supervision considering the incidence of accidents

Expand
  • 1. School of Public Administration, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, Shandong, China
    2. Yantai Special Equipment Inspection Institute, Yantai 265500, Shandong, China

Received date: 2022-06-20

  Online published: 2023-01-31

摘要

燃气安全关乎公众健康、公共安全和社会稳定, 加强燃气安全监管不仅涉及安全生产, 也是维系社会安全的重要环节. 本工作考虑了燃气事故发生的概率, 建立了燃气企业与政府监管部门的演化博弈模型. 基于演化博弈理论研究了两博弈主体策略选择的演化过程, 并对比分析了燃气企业与政府监管部门行为策略的演化稳定均衡, 基于数值仿真对模型进行了有效分析. 结果表明: ①燃气企业与监管部门的演化稳定策略与燃气事故发生概率有关联, 当燃气事故发生的概率大于安全投入到位收益和安全投入不足赔偿之和比值时, 燃气企业将会采取安全投入不足策略; ②在政府奖惩机制下, 提高政府的惩罚和奖励力度, 均会促使燃气企业采取安全投入到位行为, 但增大惩罚力度比奖励对燃气企业安全投入到位行为影响更显著, 同时对惩罚和奖励力度的增大会抑制政府严格监管行为; ③上级政府对地方政府监管部门监管失责的处罚力度大于政府部门监管成本时, 会促使地方政府监管部门最终选择严格监管; ④随着上级政府的处罚力度的增大, 对地方政府监管部门行为策略选择影响显著, 而对燃气企业行为策略选择影响并不显著. 此研究结论为政府部门有效监管燃气安全生产提供了重要决策支持.

本文引用格式

王循庆, 刘昆, 孙晓羽, 钟锦林 . 考虑事故发生率的燃气安全监管演化博弈模型与仿真分析[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 , 28(6) : 932 -945 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2451

Abstract

Gas safety is related to public health, public safety and social stability, and strengthening gas safety supervision not only involves safe production, but also is an important part of maintaining social safety. This paper considers the probability of gas accidents and establishes an evolutionary game model between gas companies and government regulatory departments. Based on evolutionary game theory, the evolutionary process of the choice of the main strategy of the two game players is studied, and the evolutionary stable equilibrium of the behavior strategy of gas enterprises and government regulatory departments is compared and analyzed, and the model is effectively analyzed based on numerical simulation. The results show that: ① The evolutionary stability strategy between gas enterprises and regulatory departments is related to the probability of gas accidents, and when the probability of gas accidents is greater than the sum ratio of full investment income and insufficient safety investment compensation, gas enterprises will adopt the safety investment strategy; ② Under the government reward and punishment mechanism, increasing the government's punishment and reward will prompt gas enterprises to adopt safe investment behavior, but increasing the punishment has a more significant impact on the safety investment behavior of gas enterprises than the reward, and at the same time, the increase in punishment and reward strength inhibits the government's strict supervision behavior; ③ When the penalty imposed by the higher level government on the supervision and responsibility of the local government supervision department is greater than the cost of the government department's supervision, it will prompt the local government supervision department to finally choose strict supervision; ④ With the increase of penalties imposed by higher-level governments, the impact on the choice of behavior strategies of local government regulatory departments is significant, but the impact on the choice of behavior strategies of gas enterprises is not significant. The research conclusions provide important decision-making support for government departments to effectively supervise gas safety production.

参考文献

[1] 张国兴. 基于博弈视角的煤矿企业安全生产管制分析[J]. 管理世界, 2013(9):184-185.
[2] 江永清. 地方政府化工企业安全监管的演化博弈分析: 以江苏省响水"3.21"爆炸事故为例[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 34(5): 58-69.
[3] 李明琨, 李慧, 何海龙, 等. 有限理性视角下突发事件社会舆论传播阶段的演化博弈分析与控制[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 27(4): 803-814.
[4] 张在旭, 刘志阳, 马莹莹. 政府监管下的企业安全生产行为研究: 基于前景理论的演化博弈分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(4): 70-78.
[5] 田水承, 王亚妮, 霍登财. 基于博弈论的石油天然气长输管道安全监管研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(5): 1891-1895.
[6] Acheampong T, Phimister E, Kemp A. What difference has the Cullen Report made?empirical analysis of offshore safety regulations in the United Kingdom's oil and gas industry[J]. Energy Policy, 2021, 155: 112354.
[7] Seungho J, Jongkwon W, Chankyu K. Analysis of severe industrial accidents caused by hazardous chemicals in South Korea from January 2008 to June 2018[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 124: 104-123.
[8] Acheampong T, Akumperigya R. Offshore risk regulation: a comparative analysis of regulatory framework in Ghana, the United Kingdom and Norway[J]. Energy Policy, 2018, 113: 701-710.
[9] 黄亮亮, 姚安林, 鲜涛, 等. 考虑脆弱性的油气管道风险评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(7): 93-99.
[10] Wu W, LI Y, Cheng G X, et al. Dynamic safety assessment of oil and gas pipeline containing internal corrosion defect using probability theory and possibility theory[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 98: 156-166.
[11] 白玉贵, 蒋雯丽, 秦琪伟, 等. 基于贝叶斯网络的城市燃气管网泄漏事故后果预测与分析[J]. 城市勘测, 2021(4): 163-168.
[12] 顾一波, 霍宇芒. 基于贝叶斯网络的地震次生燃气管道泄漏事件链构建[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(7): 134-139.
[13] 杨振宏, 王璨, 胡世杰. 基于AHP的城市燃气管道安全模糊综合评判体系研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2013, 13(2): 257-260.
[14] 肖建. 厦门市燃气行业安全生产依法监管探讨[J]. 厦门科技, 2018(5): 39-41.
[15] 凌玉梅. 瓶装燃气行业优化安全监管的若干思考[J]. 建材与装饰, 2019(20): 186-187.
文章导航

/