中文

Journal of Shanghai University >

2017 , Vol. 23 >Issue 4: 636 - 646

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.1712

Sorting TOPSIS of interval data for micro-CHP in buildings

Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2. ENN Energy Service (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China;
    3. College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2015-09-06

  Online published: 2017-08-30

Fold

Abstract

Micro-combined heat and power (micro-CHP) helps to improve energy efficiency and protect environment, thus becoming a trend in the building energy supply. In the planning stage of a micro-CHP project, evaluation of the design scheme is a key to success. To apply interval data criteria of the scheme to technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), the distance range and relative closeness are calculated using the interval ideal solution. An acceptability function is defined to in sort schemes. An example of 4 alternatives suitable for small buildings is presented to show feasibility and practicability of the method.

Key words： interval data; multi-criteria decision; technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS); micro-combined heat and power (micro-CHP)

Cite this article

RUAN Hongquan1,2, GAO Xin1, TAN Lijun3 . Sorting TOPSIS of interval data for micro-CHP in buildings[J]. Journal of Shanghai University, 2017 , 23(4) : 636 -646 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.1712

References

[1] 清华大学建筑节能研究中心. 中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告2015 [M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015: 3-5.
[2] 谢德平, 李显贵, 潘仕梁. 微型冷热电三联产发展综述[J]. 装备制造技术, 2011(2): 102-104.
[3] Barbieri E S, Spina P R, Venturini M. Analysis of innovative micro-CHP systems to meet household energy demands [J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 97: 723-733.
[4] Jahanshahloo G R, Hosseinzade L, Izadikhah M. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 175(2): 1375-1384.
[5] Jahanshahloo G R, Lotfi F H, Davoodi A R. Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: interval efficiency [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2009, 49(5/6): 1137-1142.
[6] Sayadi M K, Heydari M, Shahanaghi K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2009, 33(5): 2257-2262.
[7] Yue Z L. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2010, 24(1): 146-153.
[8] 张英俊, 马培军, 苏小红, 等. 属性权重不确定条件下的区间直觉模糊多属性决策[J]. 自动化学报, 2012, 38(2): 220-228.
[9] Dymova L, Sevastjanov P, Tikhonenko A. A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(12): 4841-4847.
[10] Liu S, Chan F T S, Ran W. Multi-attribute group decision-making with multi-granularity linguistic assessment information: an improved approach based on deviation and TOPSIS [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(24): 10129-10140.
[11] 华贲. 从燃煤热电联产到天然气冷热电联供——中国工业和建筑物从一次能源到终端利用模式的战略转型[J]. 中外能源, 2011, 16(11): 25-30.
[12] 金炼, 张亚君, 杨尚恒, 等. 家庭用微型热电联产技术[J]. 现代化工, 2012, 32(5): 6-15.
[13] 国家发展改革委经济运行调节局, 国家电网公司营销部, 南方电网公司市场营销部. 分布式能源与热电冷联产[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2013: 24-46.
[14] Zeng Z Q, Nasri E, Chini A, et al. A multiple objective decision making model for energy generation portfolio under fuzzy uncert ainty: case study of large scale investor-owned utilities in Florida [J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 75: 224-242.
[15] 吴大为. 分布式冷热电联产系统的多目标热力学优化理论与应用研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2008: 43-46.
[16] Chatzimouratidis A I, Pilavachi P A. Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(3): 778-787.
[17] Pilavachi P A, Stephanidis S D, Pappas V A, et al. Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(11/12): 2228-2234.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉