Research Articles

Risk consensus assessment of credit suppliers based on the FA-KM-GAHP model

Expand
  • 1. Shanghai Advanced Institute of International Shipping, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306
    2. School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306

Received date: 2021-05-06

  Online published: 2021-09-10

Abstract

This paper combines factor analysis (FA) theory, the K-means (KM) model, and the group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) to construct the FA-KM-GAHP models to investigate the group consensus assessment of credit suppliers. The results show that quick ratio, stability of product price, and product quality and complaints account for 28.12%, 15.85%, and 45.79% of the attributes' weight value, respectively. Credit supplier $D_2$ is superior to other suppliers by 13.82% to 57.36%. Based on these findings, suggestions for assessing and choosing credit suppliers are proposed, such as sharing the platform construction of risk consensus assessment using consortium blockchain technology.

Cite this article

YU Siqin, Liu Zhongmin . Risk consensus assessment of credit suppliers based on the FA-KM-GAHP model[J]. Journal of Shanghai University, 2022 , 28(6) : 1008 -1021 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2333

References

[1] 徐鹏. 基于结构方程模型的农产品供应链金融风险防范研究[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2018, 20(6): 128-135.
[2] 赵灿红, 罗勇. 互联网供应链金融操作风险评价及防范研究[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2018, 40(290): 108-111.
[3] 王建, 何娟. 考虑外部系统性风险因素的供应链金融长期价格风险测度研究[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2016, 31(4): 47-59.
[4] 林强, 贺勇, 李心竹. 供应商存在供应风险时供应链融资模式选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(1): 167-173.
[5] Lima Z, Armd H. Supply chain finance integrating operations and finance in global supply chains[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018: 105-142.
[6] Antonella M, Laura G, Federico C, et al. Supply chain finance: from traditional to supply chain credit rating[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2019, 5(1): 197-217.
[7] Roberta P, Nicola C, Danilo T. Supply chain finance: a supply chain-oriented perspective to mitigate commodity risk and pricing volatility[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2019, 25(1): 118-133.
[8] Erik H, Urs M S, Nicola B. Supply chain finance and blockchain technology the case of reverse securitization[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.
[9] 范建平, 朱兆钰, 吴美琴. 一种新的基于群AHP和DEA的距离测度方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2018(21): 41-45.
[10] 冯源, 张晓慧, 曹月静. 基于最大最小偏差与相似度的区间型群组决策方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2021(2): 162-167.
[11] 冯源, 曹月静. 属性和专家客观权重未知的多值中智数群决策方法[J]. 数学的实践与认, 2021, 51(1): 68-77.
[12] Labreuche C, Grabisch M. Use of the GAI model in multi-criteria decision making: inconsistency handing, interpretation[C]// Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology. 2014: 179-186.
[13] 周金明, 苏为华, 朱晓临. 加权幂平均复合判断矩阵的群体AHP一致性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 158-164.
[14] Qian J, Dong Y. Uncertainty and multi-criteria global sensitivity analysis of structural systems using acceleration algorithm and sparse polynomial chaos expansion[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 163(15): 108120.
[15] 朱兴雄, 何清素, 郭善琪. 区块链技术在供应链金融中的应用[J]. 中国流通经济, 2018, 32(3): 111-119.
[16] 刘思璐, 李华民. 嵌入区块链技术的供应链金融征信系统优化[J]. 征信, 2019(8): 16-20.
[17] Liu J K, Yan L M, Wang D. A hybrid blockchain model for trusted data of supply chain finance[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021.
[18] 李艳玲, 吴建伟, 朱烨行. 基于判断矩阵一致性程度的专家权重确定方法[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2017(2): 21-24, 29.
[19] Nikolai G S. Dependence of risk of making wrong decision in modern business systems on their organization structure[M]. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing, 2019: 85-113.
Outlines

/