Journal of Shanghai University >
Decision method for preventive maintenance of asphalt pavements considering multiple damage characteristics
Received date: 2020-09-15
Online published: 2020-11-20
Because of the diverse compositions of asphalt pavement damage, multiple cases of damage that are inspected using the same pavement condition index (PCI) may yield different damage combinations. When multiple types of damage coexist but the degree of damage is similar, obtaining targeted maintenance measures with PCI and determining the predominant damage (i.e., most severe road damage with the maximum deduction value) are challenging. Therefore, this study considers PCI analysis and an existing preventive maintenance decision-making method to clarify those sections in which the predominant damage was not well-targeted during inspection and proposes a supplementary approach to make more appropriate conservation decisions. Based on detection and maintenance data of urban roads in Shanghai from over the past five years, a sequential clustering method is used to classify road sections according to their PCI levels. The composition of and difference in pavement damage at different levels are analyzed. Then, for those sections with multiple cases of damage and no significant damage differences, road sections that historically reflect proper preventive maintenance are then selected based on whether effective preventive maintenance can be implemented. Finally, two back propagation (BP) neural network models for preventive maintenance decisions are established and compared based on the effective maintenance road sections. The main differences between the two models are the compositions of pavement damage. The results showed that when the PCI levels were high (84.4~93.0 points), the degrees of damage were very similar and the predominant damage was not represented. Of the two BP neural network models, Model 2,which considered multiple damage components, showed a higher decision accuracy. Specifically, its decision accuracy with the test set reached 86.20%. This was significantly better than that of Model 1 (58.50%), which considered only the predominant damage. Combining the BP neural network and traditional decision tree method can help to optimize decision-making processes related to asphalt pavement and improve the selection of maintenance measures.
LI Li, GUAN Tingting . Decision method for preventive maintenance of asphalt pavements considering multiple damage characteristics[J]. Journal of Shanghai University, 2022 , 28(4) : 689 -701 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2271
| [1] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 城镇道路养护技术规范: CJJ 36——2016[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2016. |
| [2] | 董瑞琨, 孙立军. 路面维护及预防性养护效益分析[J]. 公路, 2004(3): 121-125. |
| [3] | 吉增晖. 沥青路面预防性养护技术综述与探讨[J]. 公路, 2015, 60(12): 56-63. |
| [4] | Zhou G, Wang L. Co-location decision tree for enhancing decision-making of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2012, 21(1): 287-305. |
| [5] | 上海市城乡建设和管理委员会. 路面预防性养护技术规程: DG/TJ08——2176——2015[S]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2015. |
| [6] | 赵鸿铎, 马鲁宽, 唐龙, 等. 基于数据挖掘的民用机场水泥道面维护辅助决策模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(12): 1676-1682, 1753. |
| [7] | Bandara N, Gunaratne M. Current and future pavement maintenance prioritization based on rapid visual condition evaluation[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2001, 127(2): 116-123. |
| [8] | Prozzi J A, Madanat S M. Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 635-641. |
| [9] | 曹巍, 陈长. 基于多属性分析理论的预防性养护决策方法[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2015, 31(4): 71-76. |
| [10] | Kuhn K D. Pavement network maintenance optimization considering multidimensional condition data[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2012, 18(4): 270-277. |
| [11] | 周岚. 高速公路沥青路面使用性能评价及预测研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015. |
| [12] | 刘胜强. 浙江省高速公路使用性能预测及补充养护指标研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017 |
| [13] | 颜可珍, 林峰, 章金钊. 沥青路面预养护方法多属性灰色模糊决策[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 38(05): 8-12. |
| [14] | 陈文来, 凌建明, 郝航程, 等. 水泥道面调查单元划分及病害程度对PCI的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(11): 1646-1651. |
| [15] | 徐黎明, 陈剑平, 王清. 多参数岩体结构面优势分组方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(1): 189-195. |
| [16] | 宋腾蛟, 陈剑平, 张文, 等. 基于人工蜂群算法的岩体结构面多参数优势分组研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(3): 861-868. |
| [17] | 杨静. 信用评分卡的建立与应用[D]. 天津: 天津商业大学, 2018. |
| [18] | 牛晓霞, 王子彬, 李艳. 有序聚类法在路面破损状况评价中的应用[J]. 公路交通科技(应用技术版), 2016, 12(9): 21-23. |
| [19] | Li F F, Wang Z Y, Zhao X, et al. Decomposition-ANN methods for long-term discharge prediction based on fisher's ordered clustering with mesa[J]. Water Resources Management, 2019, 33(1): 1-16. |
| [20] | Fisher W D. On grouping for maximum homogeneity[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1958, 53(284): 789-798. |
| [21] | 方开泰. 有序样品的一些聚类方法[J]. 应用数学学报, 1982(1): 94-101. |
| [22] | Liu Y X, Gao B, Zhang X M. An improved sequential clustering algorithm[M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. |
| [23] | 王信增, 焦峰. 基于有序聚类法的土壤水分剖面划分[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(2): 191-196, 201. |
| [24] | Fisher W D. On grouping for maximum homogeneity[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1958, 53(284): 789-798. |
| [25] | 程珊珊, 潘玉利. 专家系统在路面养护管理中的应用研究及展望[J]. 公路交通科技, 2005, 22(6): 57-67. |
| [26] | Abdelrahim A M, George K P. Artificial neural network for enhancing selection of pavement maintenance strategy[J]. Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000, 1699(1): 16-22. |
| [27] | Hafez M, Ksaibati K, Atadero R A. Optimizing expert-based decision-making of pavement maintenance using artificial neural networks with pattern-recognition algorithms[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2019, 2673(11): 1-11. |
| [28] | 沙爱民, 蔡若楠, 高杰, 等. 基于级联卷积神经网络的公路路基病害识别[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(2): 1-9. |
| [29] | 陈仕周, 李山, 熊峰, 等. 基于GA-灰色神经网络的沥青路面使用性能预测[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 38(2): 44-50. |
| [30] | Domitrović J, Dragovan H, Rukavina T, et al. Application of an artificial neural network in pavement management system[J]. Technical Gazette, 2018, 25(Suppl.2): 466-473. |
| [31] | 孙利民, 尚志强, 夏烨. 大数据背景下的桥梁结构健康监测研究现状与展望[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(11): 1-20. |
| [32] | 丁宏飞, 李演洪, 刘博. 基于BP神经网络与 SVM 的快速路行程时间组合预测研究[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2016, 33(10): 2929-2932. |
| [33] | 胡立伟, 杨锦青, 何越人, 等. 基于改进BP神经网络的城市交通拥塞环境下车辆运行风险识别研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2019, 36(10): 105-113. |
| [34] | 夏才初, 周开方, 程怡. 基于BP神经网络的公路风吹雪雪深预测模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2017: 45(5): 714-720. |
| [35] | 陈庚, 戴放. 基于共轭梯度法的改进型BP神经网络PID控制算法[J]. 工业仪表与自动化装置, 2011(5): 7-9. |
| [36] | 周志华. 机器学习[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2016. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |