中国创业投资城市网络的区域合作及长江经济带的案例分析
收稿日期: 2016-12-24
网络出版日期: 2017-12-30
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71302050)
Regional cooperation of Chinese urban venture capital networks and case study of Yangtze Economic Zone
Received date: 2016-12-24
Online published: 2017-12-30
基于我国2000—2014年的创业投资联合投资事件数据, 以5年为时间窗口构建滚动创业投资城市网络, 并采用核心边缘结构分析方法研究中国创业投资城市网络的区域合作, 最后对长江经济带进行案例分析. 研究结果发现: 创业投资具有空间集聚现象, 创业投资城市网络形成了核心区-亚核心区-半边缘区-边缘区的差序结构; 区域间合作很不均衡, 核心区之间、核心区与亚核心区之间的合作比较普遍, 半边缘区、边缘区更乐意与核心区、亚核心区合作; 核心区城市中, 独立创业投资最活跃, 公司创业投资次之. 长江经济带的案例分析表明: 上海是长江经济带唯一的核心区, 与亚核心区的关系强度最高; 大部分城市处于半边缘区和边缘区.
李远勤1, 童林肯2, 吴哲人1 . 中国创业投资城市网络的区域合作及长江经济带的案例分析[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2017 , 23(6) : 961 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.1892
By core-periphery structure analysis and with the syndication investments events from 2000 to 2014 in China as a sample, this paper studies regional cooperation of Chinese urban venture capital networks. Dynamic venture capital urban networks are constructed every 5 years, and the behavior of cities in the Yangtze Economic Zone analyzed. The following results are obtained. First, a network structure featured by “core, sub-core, semi-periphery, periphery” shows a disparity structure among cities besides the significant phenomenon of spatial agglomeration. Second, regional cooperation is unbalanced, and there is widespread cooperation between core and core, and core and sub-core, while cities in semi-periphery and periphery are more willing to cooperate with those in core or subcore. Third, for cities in core, independent venture capitals (IVCs) are most active no matter in the same city or not, and corporate venture capitals (CVCs) are the second. The case study shows that Shanghai, the only city in core, establishes strangest cooperative relations with sub-core in the Yangtze Economic Zone. Most cities in the Yangtze Economic Zone are in semi-periphery and periphery.
Key words： cooperation; core; Yangtze Economic Zone; urban network of venture capital
[1] Pistoresi B, Venturelli V. Credit, venture capital and regional economic growth [J]. Journal of Economic and Finance, 2015, 39(4): 742-761.
[2] Venckuviene V. Building of innovation capacity in venture capital backed companies: qualitative research approach [J]. Business Management Dynamics, 2015, 4(10): 59-68.
[3] Castilla E. Network of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2003, 25(1/2): 136-150.
[4] Hochberg Y V, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y. Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(1): 251-301.
[5] Hochberg Y V, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y. Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(3): 829-859.
[6] Ozmel U, Reuer J J, Gulati R. Signals across multiple networks: how venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(3): 852-866.
[7] Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 249.
[8] 汪明峰, 魏世华, 邱娟, 等. 中国创业投资活动的空间集聚与城市网络[J]. 财经研究, 2014, 40(4): 117-131.
[9] Camagni R P. Network urban structures in northern Italy: element for a theoretical framework[J]. Urban studies, 1993, 30(6): 1053-1064.
[10] Castells M. The rise of the network society [M]. Cambridge, Wiley-Blackwell, 1996.
[11] 韩会然, 焦华富, 李俊峰, 等. 皖江城市带空间经济联系变化特征的网络分析及机理研究[J]. 经济地理, 2011, 31(3): 384-389.
[12] Benhabib J, Bisin A, Jackson O M. Handbook of social economics [M]. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 2010.
[13] Wei L J, Zhou Q. Location decisions and network configurations of foreign investment in urban China [J]. Professional Geographer, 2010, 62(2): 264-283.
[14] Zhang J. The spatial dynamics of globalizing venture capital in China [J]. Environment and Planning, 2011, 43(7): 1562-1580.
[15] Boyd J P, Fitzgerald W J, Mahutga M C, et al. Computing continuous core/periphery structures for social relations data with MINRES/SVD [J]. Social Networks, 2010, 32(2): 125-137.
[16] 宋歌. 经济学期刊互引网络的核心-边缘结构分析[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(1): 93-101.
[17] Florida R, Smith D F. Venture capital, innovation, and economic development [J]. Economic Development Quarterly, 1990, 4(4): 345-360.
[18] Powell W, Koput K, Bowie J. The spatial clustering of science and capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships [J]. Regional Studies, 2002, 36(3): 291-305.
[19] Chen K, Marchioni M. Spatial clustering of venture capital-financed biotechnology firms in the U.S. [J]. Industrial Geographer, 2008, 5(2): 19-38.
[20] 刘军. 整体网分析讲义: UCINET 软件实用指南[M]. 北京:格致出版社, 2009.
[21] Fritsch M, Schilder D. Does venture capital investment really require spatial proximity? an empirical investigation [J]. Environment and Planning, 2008, 40(9): 2114-2131.
[22] Martin R, Berndt C, Klagge B, et al. Spatial proximity effects and regional equity gaps in the venture capital market: evidence from Germany and UK [J]. Environment and Planning, 2005, 6(37): 1207-1231.
[23] Da Rin M, Hellmann T F, Puri M. A survey of venture capital research [J/OL]. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2011-044 [2017-04-03]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/ssrn.1942821.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
