机电与自动化

不同新能源扶持政策下的电力市场均衡仿真

展开
  • 上海大学机电工程与自动化学院, 上海200072
张少华(1966—), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 博士, 研究方向为电力市场风险管理和博弈分析等. E-mail: eeshzhan@126.com

收稿日期: 2014-03-03

  网络出版日期: 2014-08-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(70871074)

Equilibrium Simulation of Electricity Markets under Different Renewable Energy Support Policies

Expand
  • School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China

Received date: 2014-03-03

  Online published: 2014-08-25

摘要

为减少温室气体排放, 鼓励发展可再生能源, 许多国家推行了多种新能源扶持政策, 如可再生能源发电上网价格补贴(feed-in tariff, FIT) 政策和可交易绿色证书(tradable green certificate, TGC) 政策等, 用以完成绿色能源发电的配额要求. 为了研究不同的新能源扶持政策对寡头竞争电力市场的影响, 采用古诺竞争均衡理论分别建立了考虑FIT 和TGC 两种政策的电力市场竞争均衡模型, 并采用两层优化结构实现了市场管理者通过调控补贴价格或证书价格来追求社会福利的最大化. 通过仿真分析比较了两种政策对电力市场的影响, 得到了具有实际指导意义的结论. 该研究有助于可再生能源扶持政策的科学制定.

本文引用格式

赵琛, 张少华 . 不同新能源扶持政策下的电力市场均衡仿真[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2014 , 20(4) : 420 -428 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2861.2014.02.003

Abstract

Development of clean and renewable energy is encouraged around the world to reduce greenhouse gas emission. With the implementation of support policies such as feedin tariff (FIT) and tradable green certificate (TGC), the mandatory quota of renewable energy must be fulfilled. This study examines how the two policies affect the oligopolistic electricity markets. Using the equilibrium theory of Cournot competition, equilibrium models for electricity market considering FIT and TGC policies are established respectively. The market regulator can regulate the price of subsidy or TGC using a bi-level optimization
model to maximize social welfare. Impacts of the two policies on the electricity markets are analyzed and compared in numerical simulation. Practically meaningful results are obtained.

参考文献

[1] Tamas M M, Shrestha S O B, Zhou H Z. Feed-in tariff and tradable green certificate in oligopoly [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8): 4040-4047.
[2] Schallenberg-Rodriguez J, Haas R. Fixed feed-in tariff versus premium: a review of the current Spanish system [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 16(1): 293-305.

[3] Rickerson W H, Sawin J L, Grace R C. If the shoe FITs using feed-in tariffs to meet US renewable electricity targets [J]. The Electricity Journal, 2007, 20(4): 73-86.

[4] Mabee W E, Mannion J, Carpenter T. Comparing the feed-in tariff incentives for renewable electricity in Ontario and Germany [J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 40(1): 480-489.

[5] Leche R H, Dotzauer E, Ole J H, et al. The interaction between electricity disclosure and tradable green certificate [J]. Energy Policy, 2012, 42: 419-428.

[6] Nielsen L, Jeppesen T. Tradable green certificates in selected European countries—overview and assessment [J]. Energy Policy, 2003, 31(1): 3-14.

[7] Morthorst P E. A green certificate market combined with a liberalised power market [J]. Energy Policy, 2003, 31(13): 1393-1402.

[8] Helman U. Market power monitoring and mitigation in the US wholesale power markets [J]. Energy, 2006, 31(6): 877-904.

[9] Ventosa M, Bayllo A, Ramos A, et al. Electricity market modeling trends [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(7): 897-913.

[10] R´?a P D, Gual M A. An integrated assessment of the feed-in tariff system in Spain [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 994–1012.

[11] Lesser J A, Su X J. Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development [J]. Energy Policy, 2008, 36: 981-990.

[12] Couture T, Gagnon Y. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: implications for renewable energy investment [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(2): 955-965.

[13] Wong S, Bhattacharya K, Fulle J D. Long-term effects of feed-in tariffs and carbon taxes on distribution systems [J]. IEEE Trans Power Systems, 2010, 25(3): 1241-1253.

[14] Amundsen E S, Mortensen J B. The Danish green certificate system: some simple analytical results [J]. Energy Economics, 2001, 23(5): 489-509.

[15] Jensen S G, Skytte K. Interactions between the power and green certificate markets [J]. Energy Policy, 2003, 30: 425-435.

[16] Wang X, Li Y Z, Zhang S H. Oligopolistic equilibrium analysis for electricity markets: a nonlinear complementarity approach [J]. IEEE Trans Power Systems, 2004, 19(3): 1348-1355.

[17] Hammond G P, Akwe S S O, Williams S. Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage [J]. Energy, 2011, 36(2): 975-984.

[18] 许兆峰, 麻林巍, 李政. 中国二氧化碳捕集与封存成本估算[C]//中国动力工程学会第四届青年学会. 2009: 1-7.
文章导航

/