随着信息技术的快速发展, 软件质量已经成为用户最为关心的问题. 但由于目前较难证明软件产品的正确性, 因此一直没有一个令人信服的软件质量评价方法. 特别是已有的软件质量评价方法基本上都采用同一种评价指标对不同领域的软件进行评价, 缺乏对不同领域软件的个性化评价指标. 针对不同领域的软件质量需求和应用, 提出了不同的软件质量评价指标, 为建立面向领域的软件产品基准体系提供依据, 以满足软件产业发展的需要.
With the rapid development of information technology, software quality has become one of the users’ most concerns. However, due to the difficulties of correctness proof of software products, software quality problems do not have a convincing evaluation method. Especially, evaluation methods in different areas are based on the same kind of indices but lack individuality. This paper proposes different evaluation indices for different software quality requirements and application in different areas, which can provide a basis for a benchmark system of domain-oriented software products, and meet the increasing needs of the software industry.
[1] 杨根兴. 软件质量保证、测试与评价[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2007.
[2] 王小艺, 刘载文, 唐立军. 一种基于专家知识的软件质量多属性评价方法[C]//全国第19 届计算机技术与应用(CACIS)学术会议论文集(下册). 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2008: 1070-1074.
[3] 杨根兴, 葛孝梦, 韩良秀, 等. GB/T16260.1 ISO/IEC 91261. 第1-4 部分软件工程产品质量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
[4] 杨扬. 计算机软件质量模糊综合评价方法[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2000, 21(3): 313-315.
[5] 石柱, 何新贵. 软件质量的模糊属性及其表示[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2001, 22(4): 1-4.
[6] Cavano J P, Mccall J A. A framework for the measurement of software quality [C]//Proceeding of the ACM Software Quality Assurance Workshop. 1978: 133-139.
[7] 乔素琴, 丁秀兰. 软件测试的度量模型的研究应用[J]. 微计算机信息, 2012(2): 179-180.
[8] 聂南, 邓璐娟, 夏启明, 等. 面向不同行业软件的质量评测模型及实践[J]. 计算机科学, 2011, 38(2): 156-159.
[9] Seffah A, Kececy N, Donyaee M. QUIM: a framework for quantifying sability metrics in software quality models [C]// Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software. 2001: 311-318.
[10] Devanbu P, Karstu S, Melo W, et al. Analytical and empirical valuation of software reuse metrics [C]// 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. 1996: 189-201.
[11] Smeitink E, Dekker R. A simple approximation to the renewal function [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1990, 39(1): 71-75.
[12] Kemerer C F, Porter B S. Improving the reliability of function point measurement: an empirical study [J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1992, 18(11): 1011-1024.
