力学与土木工程

供水管破损射流冲蚀覆层的室内模型试验

  • 陆秀颖 ,
  • 陆烨
展开
  • 上海大学 力学与工程科学学院, 上海 200444

收稿日期: 2023-09-11

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-16

Indoor model test on erosion coating of damaged buried water supply pipe

  • LU Xiuying ,
  • LU Ye
Expand
  • School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2023-09-11

  Online published: 2026-03-16

摘要

开展地下水管破损射流冲蚀土层的室内模型试验,研究了覆土类型、进水压力和供水管径3种影响因素下,土层的冲蚀破坏形态、冲蚀高度和冲蚀速度的发展变化.结果发现:覆土类型会从本质上影响冲蚀破坏形态,砂土层中的塌陷空洞会堆积在冲蚀区顶部,含砾砂层中出现\上细下粗"的土颗粒重排现象,黏土层中的冲蚀空坑能暂时维持稳定;增大进水压力和减小供水管径,本质上都提高了破损口的冲蚀压力,覆层表面由向下塌陷破坏转为上凸小丘破坏.通过试验相似比尺和冲蚀高度曲线,可估算相似工程环境下水管破损射流的冲蚀时间,为城市地下市政供水管网的建设和维护提供参考.

本文引用格式

陆秀颖 , 陆烨 . 供水管破损射流冲蚀覆层的室内模型试验[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2026 , 32(1) : 142 -152 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2543

Abstract

An indoor model test was conducted to study the erosion failure pattern, erosion height, and erosion velocity of the soil layer, considering three influencing factors: soil type, water inflow pressure, and water supply pipe diameter. The results showed that the soil type affected the form of erosion failure. Collapse cavities accumulated on top of the erosion zone in a sand layer, while the erosion zone in a clay layer maintained a temporary stability. Moreover, the gravelly sand layer exhibited a rearrangement of the soil particles into a "fine upper and coarse lower" layer. Increasing the water inflow pressure, and reducing the water supply pipe diameter substantially increased the erosion pressure on the damaged mouth. The overburdened surface transformed from a downward collapse failure to an upward hill failure. Based on the test similarity scale and erosion height curve, the erosion time for a damaged jet in a similar engineering environment could be estimated, providing a reference for the construction and maintenance of urban underground water-supply networks.

参考文献

[1] 中国城市规划协会. 2021年全国地下管线事故统计分析报告[R]. 北京: 地下管线综合管理研究中心, 2022.
[2] 刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 等. 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[3] Shao Y, Yao T, Gong J Z, et al. Impact of main pipe flow velocity on leakage and intrusion flow: an experimental study [J]. Water, 2019, 11(1): 118.
[4] Alsaydalani M, Clayton C. Internal fluidization in granular soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 140(3): 128915375.
[5] 李长晋, 孙海月, 王玉川, 等. 埋设管道平面射流冲蚀沙床的试验研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2022, 47(3): 38-44, 80.
[6] He Y X, David Z, Zhang T Q, et al. Experimental observations on the initiation of sand-bed erosion by an upward water jet [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2017, 143(7): 06017007.
[7] 赵振洋. 液相管道多规格小孔泄漏规律及漏后压力计算方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(华东), 2016.
[8] 王文明, 郭建强, 周超群, 等. 城市供水管道泄漏的COMSOL流体仿真分析[J]. 中国市政工程, 2020(2): 36-41, 128.
[9] Zhang T Q, Jiang S H, Wu F X, et al. Experimental study of external pipe wall erosion due to water pipe leakage [J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2023, 14(1): 1352
[10] 戴轩, 郑刚, 程雪松, 等. 基于DEM-CFD方法的基坑工程漏水漏砂引发地层运移规律的数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(2): 396-408.
[11] 彭一飞. 管道渗漏诱发的上海砂质粉土地层渗蚀灾害细观机制研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2021.
[12] 袁鹏. 水侵城市土质路基地面塌陷机理的研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2014.
[13] 张冬梅, 杜伟伟, 高程鹏. 间断级配砂土中管线破损引起的渗流侵蚀模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(11): 2129-2135.
[14] 郑刚, 戴轩, 张晓双. 地下工程漏水漏砂灾害发展过程的试验研究及数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(12): 2458-2471.
[15] 王越林, 陆烨. 城市地区管道渗漏引发地面塌陷成灾机理的CFD-DEM联合计算模拟分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2021, 43(2): 60-67.
[16] Cui X L, Li J, Chan A, et al. Coupled DEM-LBM simulation of internal fluidisation induced by a leaking pipe [J]. Powder Technology, 2014, 254(2): 299-346.
[17] 相欣. 城市供水管网物理仿真模型研究[D]. 陕西: 西安理工大学, 2016.
文章导航

/