基于 3 种断裂韧性测试方法的试验分析

展开
  • 1. 上海核工程研究设计院有限公司, 上海 200233; 2. 西南交通大学, 四川 成都 610031; 3. 生态环境部核与辐射安全中心, 北京 100082

收稿日期: 2021-11-12

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-01

基金资助

国家科技重大专项资助项目 (2018ZX06004002) 

Experimental analysis based on three fracture toughness test methods 

Expand
  • 1. Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200233, China; 2. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, China; 3. Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of the Ministry of Ecological Environment, Beijing 100082, China

Received date: 2021-11-12

  Online published: 2023-09-01

摘要

归纳总结了 3 种 J 积分测试方法, 即卸载柔度法、规则化法和 Spb 分离参数法测量断 裂韧性的原理, 并针对某金属材料分别采用 3 种方法进行了对比测试. 发现 3 种方法均可以获 得有效的 JIC 值, 由卸载柔度法得到的 JIC 值最大, 由规则化法得到的 JIC 值最小, 但与 Spb分离参数法较为接近.

本文引用格式

王永东, 包 陈, 宁 冬, 王谊清, 景 益, 浦承皓 . 基于 3 种断裂韧性测试方法的试验分析[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2023 , 29(4) : 786 -795 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2429

Abstract

The theories of fracture toughness measurement for three J-integral test methods, including unloading compliance method, normalization method and Spb separation parameter method, are summarized, and the three methods are used to test the fracture toughness of a metal material. It is found that all the three methods can obtain effective JIC values. The JIC value obtained by the unloading compliance method is slightly greater than those obtained by the other two methods, and the result obtained by the normalization method is slightly smaller than those obtained by the other two methods but close to that by the Spb separation parameter method.
文章导航

/