研究论文

基于区间值直觉模糊集的技术创新风险评价方法

展开
  • 上海大学 管理学院, 上海 200444

收稿日期: 2018-02-21

  网络出版日期: 2020-04-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(11671250)

Technology innovation risk evaluation based on interval value intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Expand
  • School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2018-02-21

  Online published: 2020-04-29

摘要

降低企业技术创新风险是提高企业技术创新绩效的关键.首先以技术创新六阶段模型为基础,针对技术创新的全生命周期识别了 18 项潜在风险.之后基于区间值直觉模糊集构建了应用于企业技术创新风险评价的模糊失效模式与影响分析 (failuremode and effect analysis, FMEA) 方法.该方法利用区间值直觉模糊集来评价技术创新各潜在风险的严重度、发生度和检测度,通过基于逼近理想解排序法 (technique for order preference bysimilarity to ideal solution,TOPSIS) 的非线性规划模型获得风险优先级并进行排序,以此为依据确定潜在风险的优先处理次序.最后以 D 公司的座椅开发项目为例, 验证了该模糊 FMEA 方法的可行性.

本文引用格式

田永超, 于丽英 . 基于区间值直觉模糊集的技术创新风险评价方法[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2020 , 26(2) : 292 -300 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2034

Abstract

Reducing the risks of technological innovation in enterprises is the key to improving the technological innovation performance. This paper first identifies 18 potential risks based on the six-stage model of technological innovation, and then constructs the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method applied to the risk assessment of technological innovation based on the interval value intuitionistic fuzzy set. The method evaluates the severity, occurrence and detection of each potential risk by the interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy set. Risk priority numbers are obtained and sorted by the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)-based nonlinear programming solution, which can be used as a basis for prioritizing potential risks. At last, the feasibility of the fuzzy FMEA method is verified by an example of D-company's seat development project.

参考文献

[1] 包国宪, 任世科 . 政府行为对企业技术创新风险影响路径[J]. 公共管理学报, 2010,7(2):89-96.
[2] 宾厚, 汪妍蓉, 单汩源 . 基于模糊综合评价法的城市共同配送风险评价研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015(8):52-56.
[3] Govindan K, Jepsen M B . Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: a case illustration involving service suppliers[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016,67(2):339-376.
[4] Rodríguez A, Ortega F, Concepción R . An intuitionistic method for the selection of a risk management approach to information technology projects[J]. Information Sciences, 2017,375:202-218.
[5] Yeh T M, Chen L Y . Fuzzy-based risk priority number in FMEA for semiconductor wafer processes[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014,52(2):539-549.
[6] Lin Q L, Wang D J, Lin W G , et al. Human reliability assessment for medical devices based on failure mode and effects analysis and fuzzy linguistic theory[J]. Safety Science, 2014,62(1):248-256.
[7] Tooranloo H S, Ayatollah A S . A model for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy approach[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016,49:238-247.
[8] 徐泽水 . 区间直觉模糊信息的集成方法及其在决策中的应用[J]. 控制与决策, 2007,22(2):215-219.
[9] 杨洁, 李登峰 . 基于 Choquet 积分的区间值直觉模糊 SIR 群体决策方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2014(23):48-51.
[10] Atanassov K T, Rangasamy P . Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986,20(1):87-96.
[11] Atanassov K . Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989,31(3):343-349.
[12] 洪银兴 . 科技创新阶段及其创新价值链分析[J]. 经济学家, 2017(4):5-12.
[13] 裴植, 鲁建厦, 郑力 . 广义区间值直觉模糊数及其在工位评估中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012,32(10):2198-2206.
文章导航

/