收稿日期: 2019-04-24
网络出版日期: 2019-09-04
基金资助
上海市软科学研究计划资助项目(18692107500)
Comprehensive performance evaluation of teaching and research in universities using empirical analysis based on the non-oriental Super-SBM Model and the Malmquist Index: building World-Class Universities
Received date: 2019-04-24
Online published: 2019-09-04
基于非定向 Super-SBM 模型和 Malmquist 指数构建教学与科研综合绩效评价 指标体系, 并提出高校综合绩效评价方法, 采用 2012—2015 年的数据从静态和动态两个维度深入分析了 S 大学及其各学院的教学 与科研综合绩效, 为科学评价高校自身的资源配置效率, 激发高校内生动力和发展活力, 加快推进一流大学建设提供决策依据. 研究发现: 2015 年 S 大学各学院教学与科研绩效水平较高, 大部分学院的综合绩效评价有效, 其中 4 个学院需要改进资源配置; 2012—2015 年 S 大学保持了良好的绩效水平, 不同学科类型学院的综合绩效评价结果没有明显差别, 学院的教学与科研综合绩效存在规模经济; 2012—2015 年 S 大学的全要素生产率指数缓慢下降, 但管理因素对提升综合绩效水平发挥了积极作用.
关键词: 一流大学; Super-SBM 模型; Malmquist 指数; 综合绩效
晋兴雨, 张英姿, 于丽英 . 一流大学建设背景下高校综合绩效评价实证———基于非定向 Super-SBM 模型和 Malmquist 指数[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2019 , 25(4) : 625 -635 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2153
Based on the non-oriental Super-SBM Model and Malmquist Index, this paper develops a comprehensive performance evaluation index for teaching and research in universities and proposes a methodology for performance evaluation. It also presents an in-depth analysis of the operational performance, both dynamically and statistically, of S University and its colleges and schools based on data from 2012 to 2015. This would provide a basis for decision making during resource allocation scientifically, and stimulate its internal motivation and development vitality to build a leading world-class university. Empirical research revealed that the performance level of teaching and research in S University was relatively high in 2015 and most colleges and schools showed valid performance appraisal, while four colleges and schools required reasonable resource allocation. For the four years from 2012 to 2015, S University maintained a good position in its teaching and research performance with no obvious distinction seen among its different colleges and schools, and with economies of scale prevailing in the teaching and research performance of its colleges. However, a slow decline in the total factor productivity index was seen in this period. Nevertheless, the findings revealed that the comprehensive performance of a university is mainly dependent on the management.
| [1] | 许杰 . 深化校院两级管理: 经验与思索[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2016(1):42-47. |
| [2] | Johnes J . Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2006,25:273-288. |
| [3] | Kempkes G, Pohl C . The efficiency of German universities: some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods[J]. Applied Economics, 2010,42(16):2063-2079. |
| [4] | 李群霞, 马风才, 张群 . 理工农医类高校科研配置效率评价[J]. 科研管理, 2016(4):6-10. |
| [5] | 刘天佐, 徐航 . 区域高校科研绩效分类评价[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2018(1):20-29. |
| [6] | 邓云涛, 陈彪, 吕璐 . 基于 DEA 的高校教育资源利用效率实证研究——以九所教育部直属理工类高校数据为样本[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2016(2):170-175. |
| [7] | 张友棠, 李思呈, 曾芝红 . 基于 DEA 的大学预算绩效拨款模式创新设计[J]. 会计研究, 2014(1):64-70. |
| [8] | Kounetas K . Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: an application of a DEA and Tobit analysis[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2011,18(5):545-559. |
| [9] | Joanna W D . An evaluation and explanation of (in) efficiency in higher education institutions in Europe and the U.S. with the application of two-stage semi-parametric DEA[J]. Research Policy, 2017,46(9):1595-1605. |
| [10] | 陈俊生, 周平, 张明妍 . 高校人文社会科学科研投入产出效率评价——基于DEA 二次相对效率和超效率模型的实证分析[J]. 黑龙江高等研究, 2015(12):44-46. |
| [11] | Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E . Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2(6):429-444. |
| [12] | Tone K . A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002,143(1):32-41. |
| [13] | Ray S C, Desli E . Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: comment[J]. American Economic Review, 1997,87(5) : 1033-1039. |
| [14] | Lovell C A K . The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2003,20:437-458. |
| [15] | 胡振华, 刘笃池 . 我国区域科技投入促进经济增长绩效评价——基于滞后性的绩效分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(8):94-100. |
| [16] | 朱平芳, 徐伟民 . 上海市大中型工业行业专利产出滞后机制研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2005,22(9):136-142. |
| [17] | 吴玉鸣, 何建坤 . 研究型大学研发与首都区域专利产出的动态计量经济分析[J]. 科研管理, 2007,28(2):93-98. |
| [18] | 盛昭翰, 朱乔, 吴广谋 . DEA 理论方法与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996: 155-312. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |