研究论文

基于深度学习的连铸坯表面缺陷检测

展开
  • 1. 上海大学 通信与信息工程学院, 上海 200444
    2. 上海金艺检测技术有限公司, 上海 201900

收稿日期: 2017-12-18

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-04

Defect detection of continuous casting slabs based on deep learning

Expand
  • 1. School of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
    2. Shanghai Jinyi Inspection Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201900, China

Received date: 2017-12-18

  Online published: 2019-09-04

摘要

采用提取图像的纹理、几何特征并利用支持向量机(support vector machine, SVM)进行检测和识别的方法, 对宝山钢铁现有的连铸坯表面裂纹、凹陷、夹杂物、气孔、划痕等缺陷进行分析, 缺陷检测准确率为 83${\%}$. 提出一种基于卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network, CNN)的方法进行缺陷检测. 该方法对裂纹缺陷的检测准确率为 93${\%}$, 对其他缺陷(由于凹陷、夹杂物、气孔、划痕等缺陷数据较少, 这些缺陷归为一类)的检测准确率为 88${\%}$. 实验结果表明, 采用深度学习的方法 能够有效检测、识别出具有缺陷的连铸坯, 检测准确率较高.

本文引用格式

胡嘉成, 王向阳, 刘晗 . 基于深度学习的连铸坯表面缺陷检测[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2019 , 25(4) : 445 -452 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2018

Abstract

For analyzing surface defect such as surface cracks, depressions, inclusions, blow hole and scratches of continuous casting slabs, the support vector machine (SVM) can be used, and this is realized through identifying with the image texture and geometric features. The accuracy with such method is about 83${\%}$. Convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to propose a method of defect detection. The crack defect detection accuracy is 93${\%}$, and the detection accuracy for other defects (like depression, inclusions, blow hole and scratches when they are grouped together) is 88${\%}$. Experimental results show that deep learning is an effective method for detecting and identifying the defective continuous casting slabs, and the accuracy is high.

参考文献

[1] 夏纪真 . 无损检测导论 [M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2010.
[2] 张力行 . 国外热坯表面缺陷在线检测技术的开发[J]. 轧钢, 1986(5):47-51.
[3] 陈积懋 . 无损检测新技术20年回顾[J]. 无损检测, 1998(7):181-185.
[4] 何嘉武, 张超省, 冯辅周 . 红外热波无损检测技术的研究现状及应用[J]. 振动与冲击, 2010,29(S1):293-296.
[5] 吴家伟, 严京旗, 方志宏 . 基于 Adaboost 改进算法的铸坯表面缺陷检测方法[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2012,24(9):59.
[6] LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y , et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998,86:2278-2324.
[7] LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning[J]. Nature, 2015,521(7553):436-444.
[8] Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database [C]// IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2009: 248-255.
[9] Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T , et al. Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 2016,38(1):142-158.
[10] Shelhamer E, Long J, Darrell T . Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 2017,39(4):640.
[11] Xie S, Tu Z . Holistically-nested edge detection [C]// IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2016: 1395-1403.
[12] Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E . ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks [C]// International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2012: 1097-1105.
[13] Simonyan K, Zisserman A, . Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale imagerecognition[J/OL]. [ 2017- 12- 16]. .
[14] Lin M, Chen Q, Yan S . Network in network[J/OL]. [2017- 12- 16].
[15] He K, Zhang X, Ren S , et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[J/OL]. [2017- 12- 16].
文章导航

/