土木工程

约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩的承载力与破坏机理

  • 沈洋 ,
  • 王长虹 ,
  • 马铖涛 ,
  • 汤道飞 ,
  • 杨天笑
展开
  • 上海大学 力学与工程科学学院, 上海 200444

收稿日期: 2024-02-01

  网络出版日期: 2026-07-04

基金资助

上海市社会科技攻关资助项目(21DZ1204300)

Bearing capacity and failure mechanism of bored piles with constrained grouting expansion

  • SHEN Yang ,
  • WANG Changhong ,
  • MA Chengtao ,
  • TANG Daofei ,
  • YANG Tianxiao
Expand
  • School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2024-02-01

  Online published: 2026-07-04

摘要

约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩是一种结合等向高压注浆和约束挤扩的新型桩,具有抗压承载力高、成桩质量好的优点.由于挤扩体的存在,使得对桩-土共同作用的竖向承载力与破坏机理尚缺乏清晰的认识.因此,基于室内可视化半模型桩试验,结合有限元分析法,研究约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩的承载机理.根据相似原理开展缩尺可视化静荷载半模型桩试验,分析基桩的承载特性;利用数字图像相关(digital image correlation,DIC)技术,得到桩周土体的位移规律,分析基桩的承载力组成和失效破坏机理,并提出挤扩端阻修正系数.借助ABAQUS数值计算软件,选用修正Cam-Clay (modified Cam-Clay,MCC)模型,构建不同尺寸参数的约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩模型,开展抗压静载试验的数值模拟,讨论挤扩体尺寸参数对极限承载力和桩端承载力的影响,进一步研究挤扩端阻修正系数的取值.最终,建立承载力计算公式,并与现场静载试验结果进行对比,结果表明约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩属于端承摩擦桩,桩端土体的剪切破坏会导致基桩失效.结合工程实际尺寸参数,得到挤扩端阻修正系数取值范围为1.92~2.30.根据基桩尺寸参数,选取挤扩端阻修正系数,将桩端阻力修正为桩端联合承载力,极限承载力较为接近实测值,误差为9.3%.所得研究结果可为约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩的设计和推广提供理论与实践参考.

本文引用格式

沈洋 , 王长虹 , 马铖涛 , 汤道飞 , 杨天笑 . 约束注浆挤扩钻孔灌注桩的承载力与破坏机理[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2026 , 32(3) : 491 -506 . DOI: 10.12066/j.issn.1007-2861.2580

Abstract

Bored piles with constrained grouting expansion (BPCGE) are an innovative approach for piling that integrates isotropic high-pressure grouting with constrained expansion techniques. This method is recognized for its robust compressive load-bearing capabilities and superior pile quality. However, the presence of an expansion body complicates the understanding of vertical compressive pile-soil interactions, particularly those associated with the load-bearing capacity and failure mechanisms. Hence, a visual semi-model pile testing schema is developed in this study. Experimental and finite-element analyses are conducted to investigate the bearing capacity and failure mechanisms of BPCGE. Initially, a visual static load test is conducted on a semi-modeled pile based on the principle of similarity to discern the load-bearing characteristics of the pile. Digital image correlation is used to measure the displacement and deformation patterns of soil around the pile. An expansion correction coefficient for the bottom resistance is introduced following the analysis. Subsequently, numerical simulations are performed using the ABAQUS software, where the modified Cam-Clay model is utilized to simulate the compressive static-load test of BPCGE under various size parameters. The effects of these parameters on the ultimate bearing capacity and the pile’s end-bearing capacity are investigated, which are then considered to further refine the expansion correction coefficient for the bottom resistance. Finally, a formula for calculating the bearing is established, and the calculated values are compared with data from field static-load tests. The findings indicate that BPCGE can be classified as end-bearing friction piles, with the shear failure of the pile tip soil being the primary cause of failure. Meanwhile, the expansion correction coefficient for the bottom resistance should be set from 1.92 to 2.30, based on practical project considerations. By selecting an appropriate coefficient based on the size parameters of BPCGE, the pile end resistance can be adjusted to account for combined end resistance. The ultimate bearing capacity calculated using the proposed formula is consistent with actual measurements, with an error margin of 9.3%, as compared with the field test results. This study provides theoretical insights and practical guidelines for the design and implementation of BPCGE.

参考文献

[1] 左珅, 徐林荣, 赵新益, 等. 高速铁路夹硬层软基布袋注浆桩加固技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2017, 2(2): 95-101.
[2] 胡玉银, 孔德志, 阳吉宝, 等. 注浆成型扩底钻孔灌注桩的施工方法及其挤扩装置: 中国, CN102605773A [P]. 2012-07-25.
[3] Arora K R. Soil mechanics and foundation engineering (geotechnical engineering): insi units [M]. Delhi: Standard Publishers, 2000.
[4] 文松霖. 扩底桩桩端承载机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(7): 1970-1974.
[5] Christopher T, Gopinath B. Parametric study of under-reamed piles in sand [J]. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2016, 5(7): 577-581.
[6] Kido R, Suezawa R, Sawamura Y, et al. Experimental investigation of bearing mechanism of closed- and open-ended piles supported by thin bearing layer using X-ray micro CT [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2022, 62(4): 101179.
[7] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 等. 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[8] Vali R, Khotbehsara E M, Saberian M, et al. A three-dimensional numerical comparison of bearing capacity and settlement of tapered and under-reamed piles [J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 13(3): 236-248.
[9] Zhang M X, Xu P, Cui W J, et al. Bearing behavior and failure mechanism of squeezed branch piles [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 10(5): 935-946.
[10] Xiong L X, Chen H J. A numerical study and simulation of vertical bearing performance of step-tapered pile under vertical and horizontal loads [J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2020, 50(3): 383-409.
[11] 袁文忠. 相似理论与静力学模型试验[M]. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社, 1998.
[12] 国家质量技术监督局. 混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010|2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
[13] Chen Y D, Deng A, Lu F, et al. Failure mechanism and bearing capacity of vertically loaded pile with partially-screwed shaft: experiment and simulations [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 118: 103337.
[14] 中国建筑科学研究院. JGJ 106|2014建筑基桩检测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
[15] Potyondy J G. Skin friction between various soils and construction materials [J]. Géotechnique, 1961, 11(4): 339-353.
[16] 中国建筑科学研究院. JGJ 94|2008建筑桩基技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2008.
文章导航

/