English

上海大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

也谈国有公司、企业的范围 ——浅议若干犯罪主体存在的问题

徐逸仁   

  1. 上海大学法学院, 上海 200444
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-15 发布日期:2007-03-15

Also Talking on the Scope of Stateowned Companies or Enterprises——A Brief Analysis of the Problems on the Existence of Some Criminal Subjects

XU Yi ren   

  1. School of Law, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-03-15 Published:2007-03-15

被引次数

4

摘要： 刑法规定国有公司、企业、事业单位的工作人员，以国家工作人员论，属贪污犯罪的主体；刑法第165条至169条各罪之犯罪主体，只有国有公司、企业、事业单位的有关人员才能构成。国有公司、企业，应当是国有全资公司、企业。在部分刑法学者和司法实务中却把国有控股、参股公司、企业，视作国有公司、企业，并依此办案，是违背客观真实的。上述观点和做法，在理论上是危险的——毫无根据扩大刑事打击面，无视其他市场经济主体的平等权利；实践上是有害的——已经并将继续造成冤、错案，使公民权利得不到切实的保障。

关键词: 国有公司, 犯罪主体, 刑法介入度, 人权保障

Abstract: According to Criminal Law, the staffs of state-owned companies or enterprises or business units, being worked as public servants, belong to the legal subjects of bribery. And Articles 165 to 169 stipulate that only these relevant staffs could be criminal subjects. State-owned companies or enterprises should be whole-funded state-owned ones. It is against objective reality for some scholars or judicial persons to look upon state-controlled or state joint-stock companies or enterprises as state-owned ones, even handling cases according to this improper viewpoint. The above-mentioned, in theory, is dangerous, for its blind expanding of the criminal scope without considering the equal rights of the other subjects of market economy, and, in practice, harmful, for having made and being making wrong cases so as not to safeguard effectively the human rights of citizens.

Key words: criminal subjects, intervening degree of Criminal Law, protection of human rights, state-owned companies

中图分类号: